IF you're a Biden Supporter Call each and EVERY one of them and tell them you want him as the Democratic Presidential Candidate
Click here to read The number of Democrats urging Biden to drop out grows to nearly 20
Read the article, then call 202-224-3121 your opinion into EVERY one of them BEFORE
THIS IS TIME SENSITIVE! CALL BEFORE JULY 21, 2024
And while you're at it remind them what President Joe Biden has done in his 3-1/2 year term so far and not to base their decisions on
(1) 90-minute period
Joe can beat 🍊Guy
At least get through the election vs throwing us to the wolves
His supporters are FULLY behind him and Kamala
#EarlBlumenauer #EdCase #AngieCraig #LloydDoggett #RaúlMGrijalva #JaimeHarrison
#JamesHimes #JaredHuffman #MikeLevin #SethMoulton #ScottPeters #BrittanyPettersen (SHAME ON YOU) #MikeQuigley #PatRyan #AdamSchiff #BradSchneider #HillaryScholten #MikieSherrill #AdamSmith #EricSorensen #GregStanton #PeterWelch #HakeemJeffries #ChuckSchumer #Project2025 #Agenda47 #Vote #VoteBlue #JoeBiden #PresidentJoeBiden
Earl Blumenauer call 202-224-3121
Ed Case call 202-224-3121
Angie Craig call 202-224-3121
Lloyd Doggett call 202-224-3121
Raúl M. Grijalva call 202-224-3121
James Himes call 202-224-3121
Jared Huffman call 202-224-3121
Mike Levin call 202-224-3121
Seth Moulton call 202-224-3121
Scott Peters call 202-224-3121
Brittany Pettersen call 202-224-3121 (SHAME ON YOU!)
Mike Quigley call 202-224-3121
Pat Ryan call 202-224-3121
Adam Schiff call 202-224-3121
Brad Schneider call 202-224-3121
Hillary Scholten call 202-224-3121
Adam Smith call 202-224-3121
Eric Sorensen call 202-224-3121
Greg Stanton call 202-224-3121
Mikie Sherrill call 202-224-3121
Peter Welch call 202-224-3121
REMEMBER THEIR NAMES AND DON'T VOTE FOR THEM IN THEIR NEXT ELECTION
OH, MY BAD, THERE WILL BE NO MORE ELECTIONS IF 🍊GUY WINS
THESE PEOPLE WANT TO #DISENFRANCHISE 81,283,098 VOTERS
THAT'S HOW MANY VOTES JOE WON BY
In the ever-evolving landscape of politics, the discussion around age and its relevance to leadership capabilities has become increasingly pertinent. In recent years, we've witnessed debates sparked over the suitability of older candidates for high office. However, the focus on age often detracts from more critical considerations of competence, experience, and vision. It is essential for political parties to prioritize unity over division when evaluating candidates based on age, especially when those candidates possess the capability to perform the duties of their office effectively.
Age, in itself, should not be a determining factor in assessing leadership potential. What truly matters is the individual's capacity to lead, make informed decisions, and inspire confidence among constituents. History is replete with examples of leaders who excelled in their roles well into their later years, demonstrating wisdom and resilience that come with experience.
Moreover, the emphasis on age can lead to unnecessary divisions within a party and among the electorate. When political discourse fixates on age, it risks overshadowing substantive policy discussions and the qualifications of candidates. This diversion not only undermines the electoral process but also weakens the unity within the party itself.
A cohesive political party is crucial for effective governance and electoral success. When a party stands united behind its candidate, regardless of age, it sends a powerful message of confidence and stability to voters. It demonstrates a commitment to principles and policies over superficial characteristics, fostering trust and credibility among the electorate.
Furthermore, the focus on age can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and biases. Ageism, like any form of discrimination, undermines inclusivity and diversity within political institutions. It overlooks the diverse perspectives and contributions that individuals of different ages can bring to the table, thereby limiting the pool of talent and potential leadership within a party.
It is undeniable that each candidate should undergo rigorous scrutiny based on their qualifications, track record, and vision for the future. Age should be considered within the broader context of these criteria, rather than as a standalone issue. A candidate's ability to navigate complex challenges, build consensus, and lead with integrity should be the primary yardstick for evaluation.
Moreover, as societies worldwide grapple with aging populations and shifting demographics, the discourse on age in politics will only grow in significance. Political parties must lead by example in promoting inclusivity and challenging stereotypes, ensuring that meritocracy prevails over discriminatory practices.
In conclusion, the importance of unity within a political party cannot be overstated, particularly in the face of divisive debates surrounding age and leadership. By focusing on a candidate's capabilities rather than their age, parties can foster a more inclusive and robust democratic process. This approach not only strengthens the party's internal cohesion but also enhances its appeal to a diverse electorate. Ultimately, effective governance hinges on the ability to harness talent and unite around common goals, transcending superficial divisions for the collective benefit of society.
Matthew 7:15
True and False Prophets
“Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves."
Click here to order your Trump Products on CafePress
Click here to order your Trump Products on Zazzle
Click here to order your The Reckoning: Our Nation's Trauma and Finding a Way to Heal
Click here for order your Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man
Click here to order your Who Could Ever Love You: A Family Memoir
Click here to order your The Trump Indictments: The Historic Charging Documents with Commentary
As seen on www.somepeoplelie.info
and
As seen on www.somepeoplelie.shop